I’ve got a new article up on Anglican Compass about preaching Pentecost during Coronatide. It’s an easy introduction to some of the themes I develop further in How the Spirit Became God, so check it out here!
-
-
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
krhughes14 on Teaching for Spiritual Formati… trevor collins on Teaching for Spiritual Formati… krhughes14 on In Layman’s Terms: The P… mmendis on In Layman’s Terms: The P… Archives
- September 2022
- August 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- July 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- May 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
Categories
Meta
Blogroll
Kyle R. Hughes 
Thanks Kyle. Great post. Do you think there is any merit to the argument but forward by Athanasius and Didymus the Blind concerning the personhood of the Holy Spirit by appealing to the NT use of the [definite] article in distinguishing the Holy Spirt from other spirits? I’m reading through SVS’ ‘Works on the Spirit’ at the moment and was surprised by this line of argumentation. Would you consider this an example of patristic exegetical fallacy?
Good question, Shane. That SVS volume is super helpful; I treat Athansius and Didymus in HSBG, ch. 6, though I don’t make too much of that particular line of argument. I think it’s helpful, to a somewhat limited extent. If I recall, at least one of them is particularly concerned to distinguish the Holy Spirit from the notion of spirit as a component part of a being (though perhaps also other spirits?). In any event, sure, I’ll buy that a definite noun lends itself to personhood more than an indefinite noun does. Note that that is not sufficient for personhood, but perhaps it’s a minimum necessary condition? What do you think? And more importantly, are you working on something pneumatology-related?
Thanks Kyle. I was surprised by the line of argumentation, but I think it’s a valid point. I’m just reading Athanasius and Didymus for my own edification, as the saying goes. I enjoy the SVS pop patristic series. Jerome’s prologue to Didymus was hilariously cantankerous.